Tuesday, January 22, 2013

today i explode in this

from the poem bird: a memoir by susan mitchell

music, i could understand that need.  but this cry through
which the hawk funnels itself.  this narrow, this pinched -
what if all i had were two-line stanzas?  but a scream
is not language, not of any language part.  the same scream
over and over, whipping me, lashing.  the way sexual
desire is always the same feeling, the same channel
opening up between the legs, clawing

the body, finding the weakest spot to break out of.
tearing the body apart just to get out.
to open its mouth onto the other.
to suck lips, other lips, into itself.
and biting, biting, biting.
knowing in advance, this is how it's going to be.  and yet,
surprised, always the same surprise.

have i misled you?  did you think memoir meant some chronicle
of a great or splendid or tumultuous or even hysterical
century in which the famous lived?  did you expect the tone
and hue of the heroic?  some pilgrim's progress?  some
summa, some summing-up?  what, anyway, is a life?  why not
a memoir of the never finished, the only partly done?  or,
the not said, the not sung?  the underdrill of trill?

sometimes i think this, our life on earth, is an egg
to break out of.  i am claustrophobic.  into the next, into
the come-after and the come-what-may i shall peck and peck
myself, all naked of language, with only my meter
to sound the way.  what is it i am starved for?
eternity?  infinity?  forever?  or some
other word for emptiness?

to which, hush.  i stillness for stillness give, i silence
for silence.  if i am built around something i can never
understand, must i its keeper be?  must i caretake
the indigestible?  the secrets that interest me
are those from myself i keep, holes in which i lurk
by me undetected, so smoothly i the depth
of shadow mix and match.

heavenly perfume one body takes from another.  song
sung without opening the mouth.  confession is not
the same as intimacy.  and language does not open
the territory.  more like a bird calling, always up ahead,
yearning me deeper in.  here is a riddle for you,
unheimlicher bird.  what is so strange
it feels like home?  it calls.  i follow.

***

today i am perched on the tip of my tongue.  which of my
seven heavens shall i fly to?  today my attention
is everywhere at once.  to disperse, to unfocus
into showers of gold and tinsel is my one desire.
why must everything be dragged through intellect?
i am sick of meaning.  today i shall throw myself away
in puff after puff of furbish and spangle.

there was a garden: at night they snuffed the flowers,
but not their smells.  lemons burned in the trees.
a place for love?  or a place for work?  i can
no longer tell the two apart.
when the wind blew there was the sound of a sea.
my favorite moments flew off like spray.
what did i learn from this?

i liked to sleep there and also read.  was i content?
i liked to copy out of books words
that pleased me, sometimes whole passages, and as i
did this, there would rise up inside me
like a wave, there would start in my chest and
push up to my throat, a stairway without
any destination, ascending me again and again.

does joy have a purpose?  from plautus i copied out
a single word, ciccus, core of the pomegranate,
that elusive fruit which escapes the eater
every bite of the way.  surely there is more to it
than this, i'd think, sucking at seeds.
surely when i get to the center, the core: but the core
is throwaway, and ciccus also means worthless.

can anything said or thought be taken back?
today in my erotikon i wrote, art is relentless, it
refuses to look away.  it stares into me
with its hard mineral eye, inhuman.

once of myself i caught a look
all unaware in a mirror: a me apart
from any idea i have of me.

what a terrifying thing it is to be alone
with another.  should i have followed?  that glimpse
lasted a moment, no more - an acrobat, it leaped
into a world more daring: i was trapezed,
flared open, as when a cellist
drags the bow unendurably across the strings, and a more
than ordinary grieving - reckless, unheeding - begins.

should i have gone there?  in my erotikon
i always hope to find some shock
of music never listened to by me.  should i have
entered before it closed?  it was all so quick, like
birds shifting from branch to branch.
and would it have included love?
or does love need a world of its own?

***... ***

perhaps it's true, my happiest moments are the anticipation
of other moments still to come.  the evening, yet to be
unfurled, but its aroma released, burdening
the air with the heavy breathing
of the trees, their panting louder than the sky,
which has just let out squeals of acetylene and orange.
a smell so throaty, so from the armpits of the trees.

oh, to be fragrant, to break open into a great
fury of smells.  is aroma physical?  or of the spirit?
that promise of spirit tasting frustrates?
what the mouth can never close on,
twang of the elusive where instinct blurs
to indistinct?  what i hunger for
is not a parable of anything.

like feelings i come and go.  like those puddles birds
drink from after a heavy rain.  gone by morning.
and if the incomprehensible is all
that's left of the self, the personal, the private?  an outlying
beyond the sludge and gas stations, beyond
the medians where the music trembles
into blare and shouting.

bird be nimble, bird be quick, or the small
plot you call your bower will grow
into a long boring story.  there is a feeling that
comes before migration, a hastening, an upward
rush into the lining of something luxurious
no one has ever worn.
is this the future-

sound not yet an imitation
of anything?  pekke hem right up!  a voice
commanded in a dream.  peck up what?
the swirling dust, the unclear?  nightly didder of birds
when syllables intimate - but time is short.
from now on i will listen only to the arias.
spare me the long slow walk of the recitative.

do you become what you listen to?  branch
dipping, little gustos of fear, sudsy
places in the music, steepnesses, caliginous tropes?
my favorite songs are like thirst
as it is quenched.  and oh, that pale aching
green of twigs when the bark
is stripped back.

sometimes at dusk another voice begins, overripe
sweet to spoiling, a green beyond green.
so much comes at the last moment. 
like the final dance of the evening with its underbreath
of promise, its twinges of titillation, the tango
extending nervously its shadows, the long legs
of desire striding toward faster and faster tempos.

(from the book erotikon)

Monday, January 21, 2013

presque isle by louise gluck

in every life, there's a moment or two.
in every life, a room somewhere, by the sea or in the mountains.

on the table, a dish of apricots.  pits in a white ashtray.

like all images, these were the conditions of a pact:
on your cheek, tremor of sunlight,
my finger pressing your lips.
the walls blue-white; paint from the low bureau flaking a little.


that room must still exist, on the fourth floor,
with a small balcony overlooking the ocean.
a square white room, the top sheet pulled back over the edge of the bed.
it hasn't dissolved back into nothing, into reality.
through the open window, sea air, smelling of iodine.

early morning: a man calling a small boy back from the water.
that small boy - he would be twenty now.

around your face, rushes of damp hair, streaked with auburn.

muslin, flicker of silver.  heavy jar filled with white peonies.


(from the wild iris)

Saturday, January 19, 2013

the intoxicated song

from thus spoke zarathustra by friedrich nietzsche

9.
you grape-vine!  why do you praise me?  for i cut you!  i am cruel, you bleed: what means your praise of my intoxicated cruelty?
'what has become perfect, everything ripe - wants to die!' thus you speak.  blessed, blessed be the vine-knife!  but everything unripe wants to live: alas!
woe says: 'fade! be gone, woe!' but everything that suffers wants to live, that it may grow ripe and merry and passionate,
passionate for remoter, higher, brighter things.  'i want heirs,' thus speaks everything that suffers, 'i want children, i do not want myself.'
joy, however, does not want heirs or children, joy wants itself, wants eternity, wants recurrence, wants everything eternally the same.
woe says: 'break, bleed, heart!  walk, legs! wings, fly!  upward!  upward, pain!' very well!  come one! my old heart: woe says: fade!  go!

11.
all joy wants the eternity of all things, wants honey, wants dregs, wants intoxicated midnight, wants graves, wants the consolation of graveside tears, wants gilded sunsets,
what does joy not want!  it is thirstier, warmer, hungrier, more fearful, more secret than all woe, it wants itself; it bites into itself, the will of the ring wrestles within it,
it wants love, it wants hatred, it is superabundant, it gives, throws away, begs for someone to take it, thanks him who takes, it would like to be hated;
so rich is joy that it thirsts for woe, for hell, for hatred, for shame, for the lame, for the world - for it knows, oh it knows this world!
you higher men, joy longs for you, joy the intractable, blissful - for your woe, you ill-constituted!  all eternal joy longs for the ill-constituted.
for all joy wants itself, therefore it also wants heart's agony!  o happiness!  o pain! oh break, heart!  you higher men, learn this, learn that joy wants eternity,
joy wants the eternity of all things, wants deep, deep, deep eternity!

Friday, January 18, 2013

hypothesizing

from the book a guide to feminist family therapy

from womyn and eating disorders by richard schwartz & mary jo barrett ~

"social norms have taught womyn to expect limited power and to be satisfied with limited control over their lives as well as the lives of others.  womyn are not encouraged to be assertive or direct in their communication, rather they learn to be passive and covert.  they are implicitly asked to create the illusion of dependence.  illusion, because while they are supposed to be subordinate and dependent, in reality they are expected to meet their own needs and the needs of others."

"eating disorders maintain both the position of the dependent person in need of constant care and attention and the position of powerful and overcontrolling demagogue.  this indirect method of gaining power and control, while remaining subordinate is congruent with the societal message that womyn are taught.

from womyn, family therapy, and larger systems by linda webb-watson

"failure to see womyn and their families in the sociopolitical context in which they exist is the same barrier which inhibits therapists from examining the political nature of therapy.  that is, the action of diagnosing and intervening with clients has a political reality as well as a therapeutic reality.  rather than labeling therapy as interactive with an ongoing political process, edelman suggests that '. . . psychiatrists reinforce the norm that cheerful adjustment to poverty or war is healthy while despondency or anger in the face of these pathologies is sick; but their decisions are labeled medical'."

"we have found that it is through the management of meaning (either through reframing and/or positive connotation) that openings are 'discovered' in the distress."

"hypothesizing plays a significant role in this work.  an hypothesis is a descriptive device that possesses at least three elements.  the first is that the hypothesis is primarily useful rather than primarily truthful.  this allows for the abandonment of a search for the truth and facilitates the development of description upon which action can be taken.  the second element is a recognition that a hypothesis emerges as a particular point of view at a particular point in time.  what this means is that a hypothesis is subject to change as time and circumstances move on.  finally, the systemic hypothesis is an attempt to link a description of symptomatic behavior to the various members within the interacting systems."

"the advocacy stance arises when the primary punctuation is on the premise: the system created the problem."

"... many of the disagreements centered around differences in expectations and styles of approaching certain situations. ... observation of the child within the context of the classroom supported a hypothesis that cultural differences in behavior and expectations were part of the problem."

"as we reflect on the ways in which the act of family therapy is part of the politics in our society, greater clarity will be gained on our role in the stability and change of larger systems particularly as it relates to the issues of gender, culture, and class.  an apparently useful direction is the continued elaboration of the family therapist' part in the problem system."


Thursday, January 17, 2013

without fences



without fences

in the hallway of sleep, limbs curl and chase
and tag, fall down on wet ground,
laughing

like spiders, the mind ebbs into the third
person, what is caught in the glimmering
patient web

knitting of wounds, muscles clenching
and relaxing, sometimes the middle ground
is a hospital of sorts

a landscape shaped with eyes opening and shutting,
exploratory hands, words, silences,
shifting

blankets and umbrellas. sandy colorful beach.
pulls of elusive, changing moons. direct announcement of sun.
everything steams, and cools

i crush bits of paper, words like yes
and no, oracles
tossed like dice

each ingredient mixes together, hands and spoons,
a single bowl. cover, let it
rise

here is all the remarkable: the passionate synthesis,
the careful explosions. tip the scale, keep tipping.
here, the balance: restraint, recurrence.

look. this is only a moment. who steps in,
how steady, what heart, whose fire, what sound,
how does the breath build

into such grand percussion? how does the song
collapse inside the skin, why the heat
and the holding?

8.17.12

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

symbolism ~ raven/crow

from the dictionary of symbols by jean chevalier and alain gheerbrant

"recent comparative studies of the customs and beliefs of a wide range of peoples would seem to show that the purely negative aspect of the symbolism of the raven is very late and an accretion almost entirely localized to europe.  in fact, here its appearance in dreams is considered of ill omen and allied to fear of misfortune.  it is also the great black bird of the romantics, hovering over battlefields to feast on the bodies of the slain.  such an image, it is worth repeating, is recent and highly localized, although it recurs in india, where the mahabharata compares ravens with messengers of death, and perhaps in laos as well, where water soiled by ravens cannot be used in ritual aspersion.  despite this, nearly everywhere, in both east & west, the symbolism of the raven is founded upon its positive aspects.

thus in both china and japan it is a symbol of filial gratitude, the han considering the fact that it feeds its parents as auguring the reinstatement of the social order.  in japan, too, it is taken as the expression of family affection.

in japan it is regarded at the same time as a messenger of the gods, while the chou regarded it as a bird of good omen, the herald of their victories and the mark of their virtues.  the bird in question was, it is true, a red raven, bearing the color of the sun, for in china ravens were solar birds.  the symbol of the ten ravens which flew from the mulberry-tree in the east to fetch light into the world, would seem to have passed into shintoism.  however, yi the archer shot nine with his arrows, otherwise the universe would have caught fire.

han dynasty stone carvings show a three-legged raven in the center of the sun.  it would seem to be the principle giving life to the sun and perhaps stands for yang (odd-numbered).  like the tripod, the raven's three feet, which became the emblem of the chinese emperors, corresponded to the solar symbolism of dawn, noon and dusk.

in the book of genesis the bird is a symbol of clear-sightedness, since it was sent out to see if the lowlands had emerged from the waters of the flood.  'and it came to pass, at the end of forty days, that noah opened the window of the ark which he had made: and he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until all the waters were dried up from off the earth'.

in ancient greece, too, the raven was a solar bird sacred to apollo.  although plutarch says that eagles determined the sitting of the omphalos at delphi, strabo states that this task was performed by ravens.  at least both birds have this in common, that they acted as messengers of the gods and performed prophetic roles.  ravens were also attributes of mithras, and these were believed to be endowed with the power of casting evil spells.

ravens are common features of celtic legend, in which they play prophetic roles. . . in ireland, the war-goddess took the name of 'bobd' or carrion-crow and often appeared in this shape.  the crow is the nocturnal aspect of the raven and in ancient greece was sacred to athene while, as we have seen, the raven was apollo's bird.

in any case, ravens play a fundamental part in the welsh tale, 'the dream of rhonabwy': when arthur's men slaughtered owein's ravens, the surviving birds reacted violently and in their turn hacked the soldiers to pieces.  ravens still occupy a respectable place in folklore.  the birds were sacred to the gauls and in german mythology were the companions of wotan (odin).

in scandinavian mythology, two ravens perched on odin's throne, hugin (mind) and munnin (memory), and a pair of wolves crouched beside the god.  the two ravens stand for the creative and the two wolves for the destructive principle.

'among the tlingit indians (northwest pacific), the central divine figure is the crow, primeval hero and demiurge, who made the world (or, more precisely, set it in order, and spread civilization and culture through it), created and liberated the sun, and so on'.  the crow endowed it with the dynamic and regulatory element.

. . .

in the mandan spring festival, the 'first man', herald of renewal who commemorated the 'retreat of the waters', had his naked body painted white, wore only a cape made from the pelts of four white wolves and had two tufts of ravens' feathers stuck in his hair.

the messenger of the mayan god of thunder and the thunderbolt was a raven (popol-vuh).

from africa comes evidence of the raven's role of guide and guardian spirit.  the likuba and likuala in the congo basic regard the rave as 'a bird which warns men of the dangers threatening them'.

ravens may also be regarded as symbols of solitude, or rather of the deliberate self-isolation of the individual who has determined to live upon a higher level.  they may also be seen as emblems of hope with their constant cry, according to suetonius, of cras! cras! (tomorrow! tomorrow!).

. . . the bird is in any case a guide, and even guides souls on their last journey since, as a conductor of souls, his keen sight pierces the darkness and he is not led astray.  it would seem as if this positive aspect is linked to the beliefs of nomadic hunters and fisherfolk and that the raven only became negative when mankind settled and agricultural communities developed.

alchemists have always associated the stage of putrefaction, when matter becomes black, with the raven.  they call this stage 'the raven's head': it is leprous and must be bleached by 'bathing seven times in the waters of jordan'.  these are the imbibitions, sublimations, cohobations or digestion of matter, all practiced under the lordship of fire alone.  this is why the black bird is so often depicted on the pages of ancient treatises of hermetic lore."

Monday, January 14, 2013

prism by louise gluck

1.
Who can say what the world is? The world
is in flux, therefore
unreadable, the winds shifting,
the great plates invisibly shifting and changing–
2.
Dirt. Fragments
of blistered rock. On which
the exposed heart constructs
a house, memory: the gardens
manageable, small in scale, the beds
damp at the sea’s edge–
3.
As one takes in
an enemy, through these windows
one takes in
the world:
here is the kitchen, here is the darkened study.
Meaning: I am master here.
4.
When you fall in love, my sister said,
it’s like being struck by lightning.
She was speaking hopefully,
to draw the attention of the lightning.
I reminded her that she was repeating exactly
our mother’s formula, which she and I
had discussed in childhood, because we both felt
that what we were looking at in the adults
were the effects not of lightning
but of the electric chair.
5.
Riddle:
Why was my mother happy?
Answer:
She married my father.
6.
“You girls,” my mother said, “should marry
someone like your father.”
That was one remark. Another was,
“There is no one like your father.”
7.
From the pierced clouds, steady lines of silver.
Unlikely
yellow of the witch hazel, veins
of mercury that were the paths of the rivers–
Then the rain again, erasing
footprints in the damp earth.
8.
The implication was, it was necessary to abandon
childhood. The word “marry” was a signal.
You could also treat it as aesthetic advice;
the voice of the child was tiresome,
it had no lower register.
The word was a code, mysterious, like the Rosetta stone.
It was also a roadsign, a warning.
You could take a few things with you like a dowry.
You could take the part of you that thought.
“Marry” meant you should keep that part quiet.
9.
A night in summer. Outside,
sounds of a summer storm. Then the sky clearing.
In the window, constellations of summer.
I’m in a bed. This man and I,
we are suspended in the strange calm
sex often induces. Most sex induces.
Longing, what is that? Desire, what is that?
In the window, constellations of summer.
Once, I could name them.
10.
Abstracted
shapes, patterns.
The light of the mind. The cold, exacting
fires of disinterestedness, curiously
blocked by earth, coherent, glittering
in air and water,
the elaborate
signs that said now plant, now harvest–
I could name them, I had names for them:
two different things.
11.
Fabulous things, stars.
When I was a child, I suffered from insomnia.
Summer nights, my parents permitted me to sit by the lake;
I took the dog for company.
Did I say “suffered”? That was my parents’ way of explaining
tastes that seemed to them
inexplicable: better “suffered” than “preferred to live with the dog.”
Darkness. Silence that annulled mortality.
The tethered boats rising and falling.
When the moon was full, I could sometimes read the girls’ names
painted to the sides of the boats:
Ruth Ann, Sweet Izzy, Peggy My Darling–
They were going nowhere, those girls.
There was nothing to be learned from them.
I spread my jacket in the damp sand,
The dog curled up beside me.
My parents couldn’t see the life in my head;
when I wrote it down, they fixed the spelling.
Sounds of the lake. The soothing, inhuman
sounds of water lapping the dock, the dog scuffing somewhere
in the weeds–
12.
The assignment was to fall in love.
The details were up to you.
The second part was
to include in the poem certain words,
words drawn from a specific text
on another subject altogether.
13.
Spring rain, then a night in summer.
A man’s voice, then a woman’s voice.
You grew up, you were struck by lightning.
When you opened your eyes, you were wired forever to your true love.
It only happened once. Then you were taken care of,
your story was finished.
It happened once. Being struck by lightning was like being vaccinated;
the rest of your life you were immune,
you were warm and dry.
Unless the shock wasn’t deep enough.
Then you weren’t vaccinated, you were addicted.
14.
The assignment was to fall in love.
The author was female.
The ego had to be called the soul.
The action took place in the body.
Stars represented everything else: dreams, the mind, etc.
The beloved was identified
with the self in a narcissistic projection.
The mind was the subplot. It went nattering on.
Time was experienced
less as narrative than ritual.
What was repeated had weight.
Certain endings were tragic, thus acceptable.
Everything else was failure.
15.
Deceit. Lies. Embellishments we call
hypotheses–
There were too many roads, to many versions.
There were too many roads, not one path–
And at the end?
16.
List the implications of “crossroads.”
Answer: a story that will have a moral.
Give a counter-example:
17.
The self ended and the world began.
They were of equal size,
commensurate,
one mirrored the other.
18.
The riddle was: why couldn’t we live in the mind.
The answer was: the barrier of the earth intervened.
19.
The room was quiet.
That is, the room was quiet, but the lovers were breathing.
In the same way, the night was dark.
It was dark, but the stars shone.
The man in bed was one of several men
to whom I gave my heart. The gift of the self,
that is without limit.
Without limit, though it recurs.
The room was quiet. It was an absolute,
like the black night.
20.
A night in summer. Sounds of a summer storm.
The great plates invisibly shifting and changing–
And in the dark room, the lovers sleeping in each other’s arms.
We are, each of us, the one who wakens first,
who stirs first and sees, there in the first dawn,
the stranger.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

different heights

each from different heights
by stephen dunn

That time I thought I was in love
and calmly said so
was not much different from the time
I was truly in love
and slept poorly and spoke out loud
to the wall
and discovered the hidden genius
of my hands
And the times I felt less in love,
less than someone,
were, to be honest, not so different
either.
Each was ridiculous in its own way
and each was tender, yes,
sometimes even the false is tender.
I am astonished
by the various kisses we're capable of.
Each from different heights
diminished, which is simply the law.
And the big bruise
from the long fall looked perfectly white
in a few years.
That astounded me most of all.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

overresponsible.

from female legacies: intergenerational themes and their treatment for womyn in alcoholic families by claudia bepko from the book a guide to feminist family therapy 

"drinking will reinforce a womyn's already ascribed one-down status."

"one function of alcohol is to make tolerable the constricting and paradoxical demands of the female role - on the one hand drinking relieves the pressure of being a caretaker and on the other it permits a forbidden sense of power.  ultimately it provides punishment for both."

"commonly each overresponsible womyn began to take 'pride' in her overfunctioning and became perfectionistic, controlling, or giving as an attempt to salvage self-esteem, to cover feelings of inadequacy, and indeed to maintain a pseudo sense of self in a family environment in which all healthy self focus and growth is sacrificed to an obsessive preoccupation with alcohol and the alcoholic.  emotional expressiveness is significantly absent in all family relationships.  none of the womyn in the family are capable of expressing anger openly or directly.  they all suffer from chronic depression, underlying guilt, and low self-esteem.  they choose partners with whom they have clear one up or one down complementary.  if they operate in the one-up position with their partner, it is in the interest of having what is experienced as a valid target on whom to externalize anger."

"this drama occurs in a larger context in which it is assumed that males are entitled to power and to having needs met without having to make those needs known explicitly, in which the 'appropriate' hierarchical arrangement is one in which the male is one up, and in which all womyn inherit a legacy of intense guilt if they do not overfunction or, conversely, if they do directly acknowledge their anger or their own desires and feelings."

"her major goal was to develop a sense that she had a right to assert her needs, views, and strengths for her own benefit rather than everyone else's.  she continually fought the feeling that such behavior was disloyal and would result in her being unloved and abandoned."

"as M attempted to reverse her role in the family, she met with much anger and hostility.  she went from being in the 'hero' role to being in the 'scapegoat' role. . . M needed to have validated and to grieve the emotional realities of life in an alcoholic family: the very real emotional deprivation, and the inappropriate demands made on her as a child to be an adult rather than to experience acceptance of and response to her dependency."

"M gradually realized that the 'strengths' she took pride in, competence, intellectual understanding, and focus on achievement, were survival skills that now sometimes blocked her emotional development.  they sometimes became overstated attempts to gain a sense of self in a family in which there was little or no validation of her value as a person or as a womyn."

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

the wanderer

from thus spoke zarathustra by friedrich nietzsche

i am a wanderer and a mountain-climber (he said to his heart), i do not like the plains and it seems i cannot sit still for long.
and whatever may yet come to me as fate and experience - a wandering and a mountain-climbing will be in it: in the final analysis one experiences only oneself.
the time has passed when accidents could befall me; and what could still come to me that was not already my own?
it is returning, at last it is coming home to me - my own Self and those parts of it that have long been abroad and scattered among all things and accidents.
and now i know one thing more: i stand now before my last summit and before the deed that has been deferred the longest.  alas, i have to climb my most difficult path!  alas, i have started upon my loneliest wandering!
but a man of my sort does not avoid such an hour: the hour that says to him: 'only now do you tread your path of greatness!  summit and abyss - they are now united in one!
'you are treading your path of greatness: now what was formerly your ultimate danger has become your ultimate refuge!
'you are treading your path of greatness: now it must call up all your courage that there is no longer a path behind you!
'you are treading your path of greatness: no one shall steal after you here!  your foot itself has extinguished the path behind you, and above that path stands written: Impossibility.
'and when all footholds disappear, you must know how to climb upon your own head: how could you climb upward otherwise?
'upon your own head and beyond your own heart!  now the gentlest part of you must become the hardest.
'he who has always been very indulgent with himself sickens at last through his own indulgence.  all praise to what makes hard!  i do not praise the land where butter and honey - flow!
'in order to see much one must learn to look away from oneself - every mountain-climber needs this hardness.
'but he who, seeking enlightenment, is over-eager with his eyes, how could he see more of a thing than its foreground!
'you, however, o zarathustra, have wanted to behold the ground of things and their background: so you must climb above yourself - up and beyond, until you have even your stars under you!'
yes!  to look down upon myself and even upon my stars: that alone would i call my summit, that has remained for me as my ultimate summit!

thus spoke zarathustra to himself as he climbed, consoling his heart with hard sayings: for his heart was wounded as never before.  and when he arrived at the top of the mountain ridge, behold, there lay the other sea spread out before him: and he stood and was long silent.  but the night at this height was cold and clear and bright with stars.

i know my fate (he said at last with sadness).  well then!  i am ready.  my last solitude has just begun.
ah, this sorrowful, black sea beneath me!  ah, this brooding reluctance!  ah, destiny and sea!  now i have to go down to you!
i stand before my highest mountain and my longest wandering: therefore i must first descend deeper than i have ever descended,
-deeper into pain than i have ever descended, down to its blackest stream!  so my destiny will have it.  well then!  i am ready.
whence arise the highest mountains?  i once asked.  then i learned that they arise from the sea.
this testimony is written into their stones and into the sides of their summits.  the highest must arise to its height from the deepest.
thus spoke zarathustra on the mountain summit, where it was cold; when he drew near to the sea, however, and at length stood alone beneath the cliffs, he had gown weary on the way and more yearning that he was before.
everything is still asleep (he said); even the sea is asleep.  its eye looks at me drowsily and strangely.
but it breathes warmly; i feel it.  and i feel, too, that it is dreaming.  dreaming, it writhes upon a hard pillow.
listen!  listen!  how it groans with wicked memories!  or with wicked expectations?
ah, i am sad with you, dark monster, and angry even with myself for your sake.
alas, that my hand has insufficient strength!  in truth, i should dearly like to release you from your bad dreams!

and as zarathustra spoke, he laughed at himself with melancholy and bitterness.  what, zarathustra!  he said, do you want to sing consolation even to the sea?
ah, you fond fool, zarathustra, too eager to trust!  but that is what you have always been: you have always approached trustfully all that is fearful.
you have always wanted to caress every monster.  a touch of warm breath, a little soft fur on its paw - and at once you have been ready to love and entice it.
love is the danger for the most solitary man, love of any thing if only it is alive!  indeed my foolishness and modesty in love is laughable!

thus spoke zarathustra and laughed again: but then he thought of the friends he had left, and he was angry with himself because of his thoughts, as if he had injured his friends with them.  and forthwith the laughing man wept - for anger and longing did zarathustra weep bitterly.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

witchy resistance

quotes from caliban & the witch by silvia federici

"the figure of the witch, who in the tempest is confined to a remote background, in this volume is placed at the center-stage, as the embodiment of a world of female subjects that capitalism had to destroy: the heretic, the healer, the disobedient wife, the womyn who dared to live alone, the obeha womyn who poisoned the master's food and inspired the slaves to revolt."

"a return of the most violent aspects of primitive accumulation has accompanied every phase of capitalist globalization, including the present one, demonstrating that the continuous expulsion of farmers from the land, war and plunder on a world scale, and the degradation of womyn are necessary conditions for the existence of capitalism in all times."

"it is generally agreed that the witch-hunt aimed at destroying the control that womyn had exercised over their reproductive function and served to pave the way for the development of a more oppressive patriarchal regime."

"feminists have uncovered and denounced the strategies and the violence by means of which male-centered systems of exploitation have attempted to discipline and appropriate the female body, demonstrating that womyn's bodies have been the main targets, the privileged sites, for the deployment of power techniques and power-relations. . . [including] the policing of womyn's reproductive function, the effects on womyn of rape, battering, and the imposition upon them of beauty as a condition for social acceptability."

"the body has been for womyn in capitalist society what the factory has been for male waged workers: the primary ground of their exploitation and resistance, as the female body has been appropriated by the state and men and forced to function as a means for the reproduction and accumulation of labor."

"for capitalism must justify and mystify the contradictions built into its social relations - the promise of freedom vs. the reality of widespread coercion, and the promise of prosperity vs. the reality of widespread penury - by denigrating the 'nature' of those it exploits: womyn, colonial subjects, the descendants of african slaves, the immigrants displaced by globalization."

"marx did not see that the development of workers' industrial powers was at the cost of the underdevelopment of their powers as social individuals, although he recognized that workers in capitalist society become so alienated from their labor, from their relations with others, and the products of their work as to become dominated by them as if by an alien force."

Friday, December 28, 2012

come on out

from the essay lesbian daughters and lesbian mothers: the crisis of disclosure from a family systems perspective by jo-ann krestan from the book a guide to feminist family therapy

"when it is not possible for an individual to have and express a sense of where she stands on important emotional issues without becoming reactive if other individuals in the family challenge her or try to convince her to be different, then an emotional 'cut-off' often ensues in which family members may maintain polite but superficial contact with one another but in which authentic relatedness is not possible."

"it is as though the heterosexual pair operates in an energy field of centrifugal force and the homosexual pair operates in a field of centripetal force."

"although many young womyn are choosing to remain single longer, the re-definition of role for the heterosexual womyn still takes place within a relational context- marriage- which is normative.  a lesbian womyn's struggle to define herself takes place within a context defined as deviant.  she is in many ways an invisible womyn for whom no relational rules exist."

"i believe that all persons need to define themselves in a way which owns their own power, to differentiate a self- distinguishable from their familial, social, ethnic, and cultural context.  this differentiation is necessary if womyn are to function as mature, responsible adults who can direct their own course in life, and yet enter into intimate relationships with other adults."

"such differentiation, however, has traditionally been socially sanctioned, modeled, and reinforced for men, but punished in womyn. . . womyn who do not define themselves through their relationship with men but rather through their relationship to other womyn. . . pose particular threats to more traditional notions of who womyn are."

"as womyn begin to be free to be themselves with each other, they can begin to overcome the effects of a society which silences them.  it is not just lesbian womyn who must learn to be themselves without the need for self-justification.  all womyn need to learn to 'come out'."

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

ABRACADABRA

from the penguin dictionary of symbols by jean chevalier and alain gheerbrant

"this charm was used throughout the middle ages.  'one only had to write it down in the triangular pattern shown below and wear it round one's neck as a sort of phylactery or charm to be protected from various diseases and to be cured of fever':

ABRACADABRA
 ABRACADABR
  ABRACADAB
   ABRACADA
    ABRACAD
     ABRACA
      ABRAC
       ABRA
        ABR
         AB
          A

the word derives from the hebrew abreg ad habra meaning 'strike dead with thy lightning'.  in hebrew it comprises nine letters.  'placing aleph on the left side of the triangle - and its ninefold repetition- is the magical element'.

by arranging the letters in a reverse triangle, the celestial energies which the charm claims to entrap are directed downwards.  accordingly, the figure should be seen three-dimensionally as a funnel.  the magic letters slanting down from the wide mouth to the narrow spout comprise the lines of force of a mighty whirlwind.  woe betide the powers of evil which it strikes since they will vanish for ever from the world above into the abyss from which there is no return.

in this sense, the charm, abracadabra, was a response to those same fears which inspired the invention of the amulet, charm or pentacle.  it is only one of the many charms based upon a very ancient symbolism and it has been compared with one of the names of mithras, the sun-god and saviour who offers sacrifice.

like amulets, talismans and pentacles, this charm seeks to give the individual a sense of protection through communication with the higher powers and with the mysterious laws which govern the universe."




Monday, December 24, 2012

the fortress that she saw



"the castle, fortress or stronghold is the near-universal symbol of humanity's inner refuge, the cavern of the heart, that place of privileged intercourse between the soul and its god, or the absolute. . .
in the bhagavad gita (5: 13), the 'castle with nine gates' is a metaphor for the body of the yogi, closed to feelings for and attachments to the outside world, and therefore safeguarding his inner spiritual concentration. . .
just as in stories and in dreams, castles are usually set either upon hilltops, or in forest glades.  they are strongly built and hard to come at.  they convey the feeling of security, as do houses in general, but at a far higher level.  they are symbols of protection.
yet their locations in some measure set them apart in the middle of fields, woods or hill country.  what they immure is isolated from the rest of the world and assumes an aura of remoteness which makes it as desirable as it is inaccessible. . .
spiritual transcendence is the castle's protection.  castles are deemed to shelter some mysterious and intangible force.  they appear in enchanted forests and mountains, themselves laden with the power of holiness, and magically vanish like mirages on the approach of some knight errant. . . the castle symbolizes the realization of the heart's desire."

from the penguin dictionary of symbols by jean chevalier and alain gheerbrant

Saturday, December 22, 2012

concept: parentification

quotes from the essay "women and abuse in the context of the family" by margaret cotroneo (from the book a guide to feminist family therapy)

"the american family has become our society's most violent institution."

in a 1980 study of abused womyn, two important concepts were introduced: "the theory of learned helplessness and the cycle theory of violence.  learned helplessness is a social learning theory which proposes that womyn who are repeatedly exposed to abuse learn that no response will be effective in controlling violence."

"the more a womyn's social ties overlap with those of her partner, the more difficult it may be for her to obtain support in dealing with the battering situation.  in addition, increased levels of violence are associated with a greater likelihood that the responses of friends may be characterized by avoidance and discomfort.  thus, even friendships may be unavailable as supportive resources for moving out of an abusive relationship."

"it is not clear that the victim stance empowers womyn themselves.  when womyn are defined as victims, their entitlement to consideration is contingent upon the responsiveness of others.  this reinforces their inclination to adapt their choices to the expectations of people upon whom they depend while their own wants, needs, and contributions are taken for granted.  furthermore, it feeds a cycle of self-doubt as womyn may come to believe that whatever happens to them, happens simply because they are womyn."

"in my observations of abused womyn in family therapy, i find that it is not relationships that exploit.  rather, it is modes of relating that shape a process of exploitation over time.  a large part of the therapeutic work centers on building trust in the self as a person who can take responsibility for her/his own well-being in the context of caring about others and being responsive to their needs and expectations."

"gilligan proposed two distinct forms of self-definition in relation to others.  they are separation and connection.  separation is characterized by independence, self-sufficiency, and autonomy while connection is characterized by interdependence, mutual reliance, and responsibility for others.  separation is oriented toward an ethic of justice and rights.  relationship is experienced as reciprocity between separate individuals who are rooted in roles and operate out of rules of fairness.  a basic rule is to consider others as one would like to be considered.  the mode of connection is oriented toward an ethic of care and response.  relationship is experienced as response to others on their terms, with a concern for their well-being and the alleviation of their burdens.  gilligan proposes that men more typically construct their relationships in terms of separation and womyn in terms of connection.  she does not view the different orientations of womyn and men as biologically determined but rather that they derive out of childhood experiences of inequality and interdependence.  with equal frequency, both womyn and men construct a self definition that is organized in terms of relationship to others."

"there are numerous examples of abused womyn who continue to respond to their abusers with care, consideration, and protection. . . they are preoccupied with doing the 'right' thing; that is, taking action that is least likely to hurt their abuser.  such responses contradict reason and reality, however, they reflect a genuine conflict about what is owed to self vs. what is owed to others that can be paralyzing.  loyalty of this nature characterizes abusive families.  it is shaped by expectations of care and devotion held in common among family members and transmitted from generation to generation.  loyalty is like an invisible intergenerational tapestry woven from the fibers of caring relationships.  although it often goes unacknowledged in the family, it is considered to be a powerful motivator of behavior."

"it is how the important people in their lives responded to them around the issues of abandonment, betrayal of trust, conflicting loyalties, and entitlement to justice that shapes the lifelong pain of womyn in abusive situations.  when accountability is not elicited in a dialogue among all those who are affected by the abuse, the abused client is left to carry the burden of guilt and shame for the whole family."

"in my work i use the relational concept of parentification to explain the mode of relating associated with loyalty.  parentification is characterized by inappropriate expectations for care and devotion that are enslaving.  persons who are parentified carry a burden of guilt-laden obligation for the well-being of others while their own needs go unacknowledged.  the parentified one is bound to the relationship through a process of giving and receiving which is counterautonomous.  because she does not feel entitled to speak on her own terms, she makes her choices contingent upon the expectations of others."

"a person becomes sensitized to parentification in the family of origin.  when parents, for whatever reason and regardless of fault, cannot appropriately give to their children, the children tend to react to the loss of care with greater emotional attachment.  they become parents to their parents in order to get parenting.  whatever gains they receive are received by meeting the parents' needs.  asking for something for oneself is associated with selfishness. . . thus emotionally bound, they are not free to give appropriately in relationships outside the family unless and until they come to terms with the loss or deprivation of care they have experienced in the family of origin."

"in intrafamilial abuse, this code of fairness requires that care for others must take precedence over care for the self.  parentification is an intensely painful experience for womyn primarily because their contributions go unacknowledged. . . resentment is shaped by the lack of acknowledgement and becomes paralyzing."

"womyn are frequently blamed for what seems to be passivity and adaptation in the face of abuse.  in being strong for others, they appear to be weak.  by protecting their partners, they become sponges for failure and perceive themselves as incompetent.  failing to please their partner, they no longer trust their own judgment.  their thinking reflects their experience, as they continue to assign to themselves the responsibility for their partner's problems, hurts, and failures."

"in working with womyn clients who are abused, i work toward de-parentification.  the therapeutic work is guided by three major considerations: 1. acknowledging the contributions that have previously been taken for granted; 2. exploration and discouragement of the means of parentification; and 3. a retracing of the path of parentification that occurred in the family of origin."

"the therapist needs to remain open to the client's perspective on what she has given and what she has gained in the relationship. . . this should be done without blame or scapegoating of the abuser on the part of the therapist.  otherwise, the client can be caught in a loyalty conflict and might be forced to reaffirm her loyalty to the spouse/partner by distancing herself from the therapy.  the message of the therapist that would be most helpful is a solid, straightforward advocacy of the female client that, at the same time, allows for the humanization and personalization of her abuser.  to genuinely advocate for an abused womyn is to extend due consideration to all those relationships that are important to her, with their resources as well as their limitations.  it is a way of extending trust to womyn who have grown accustomed to being criticized for caring."

"encouraging the client to tell her story to others, including parents and siblings, is also necessary in order to intervene early in the feelings of shame and guilt and thereby to allow the resentment to surface. . . confronting this loyalty system directly is ultimately strengthening because it has the effect of reducing fear and dysfunctional protective behaviors within the abusive relationship."

"abusers tend to take a position of extreme entitlement to unilateral consideration.  however, their genuine entitlement to ask for what they need has been consistently diminished by exploitative actions.  therefore, they use force to strengthen their claim to entitlement."

"family of origin work reverses the parentification in the relationships to one's own parents because it intervenes in the tendency to protect one's parents from one's own needs and wants."




Friday, December 21, 2012

scholars, poets, redemption

from thus spoke zarathustra by friedrich nietzsche, translated by r.j. hollingdale

"i love freedom and the air over fresh soil; i would sleep on ox-skins rather than on their dignities and respectabilities.
i am too hot and scorched by my own thought: it is often about to take my breath away.  then i have to get into the open air and away from all dusty rooms.
but they sit cool in the cool shade: they want to be mere spectators in everything and they take care not to sit where the sun burns upon the steps.
like those who stand in the street and stare at the people passing by, so they too wait and stare at thoughts that others have thought."
from -of scholars-

"but all poets believe this: that he who, lying in the grass or in lonely bowers, pricks up his ears, catches a little of the things that are between heaven and earth.
and if they experience tender emotions, the poets always think that nature herself is in love with them:
and that she creeps up to their ears, to speak secrets and amorous flattering words into them: of this they boast and pride themselves before all mortals!
alas, there are so many things between heaven and earth of which only the poets have let themselves dream!"
"thus the sea gave a stone to the hungry man.  and they themselves may well originate from the sea.
to be sure, one finds pearls in them: then they themselves are all the more like hard shell-fish.  and instead of the soul i often found in them salty slime.
they learned vanity, too, from the sea: is the sea not the peacock of peacocks?
it unfurls its tail even before the ugliest of buffaloes, it never wearies of its lace-fan of silver and satin.
the buffalo looks on insolently, his soul like the sand, yet more like the thicket, but most like the swamp.
what are beauty and sea and peacock-ornaments to him?  i speak this parable to the poets.
truly, their spirit itself is the peacock of peacocks and a sea of vanity!
the poet's spirit wants spectators, even if they are only buffaloes!
but i have grown weary of this spirit: and i see the day coming when it will grow weary of itself.
already i have seen the poets transformed; i have seen them direct their glance upon themselves.
i have seen penitents of the spirit appearing: they grew out of the poets."
from -of poets-

"and when my eye flees from the present to the past, it always discovers the same thing: fragments and limbs and dreadful chances - but no men!"
"to redeem the past and to transform every 'it was' into an 'i wanted it thus!' - that alone do i call redemption!
will - that is what the liberator and bringer of joy is called: thus i have taught you, my friends!  but now learn this as well: the will itself is still a prisoner.
willing liberates: but what is it that fastens in fetters even the liberator?
'it was': that is what the will's teeth gnashing and most lonely affliction is called.  powerless against that which has been done, the will is an angry spectator of all things past.
the will cannot will backwards; that it cannot break time and time's desire - that is the will's most lonely affliction."
"i led you away from these fable-songs when i taught you: 'the will is a creator.'
all 'it was' is a fragment, a riddle, a dreadful chance - until the creative will says to it: 'but i will it thus!'
until the creative will says to it: 'but i will it thus!  thus shall i will it!'
but has it ever spoken thus?  and when will this take place?  has the will yet been unharnessed from its own folly?
has the will become its own redeemer and bringer of joy?  has it unlearned the spirit of revenge and all teeth-gnashing?
and who has taught it to be reconciled with time, and higher things than reconciliation?
the will that is the will to power must will something higher than any reconciliation - but how shall that happen?  who has taught it to will backwards, too?"
from -of redemption-

"it is the stillest words which bring the storm.  thoughts that come on doves' feet guide the world."
from -the stillest hour-